Connect with us

Stock Market

UK says Baker Hughes-Altus deal could hurt competition in oil well services By Reuters

Avatar

Published

on


© Reuters. FILE PHOTO: The Baker Hughes (BKR) company logo is seen in this photo provided July 21, 2020. Baker Hughes/Handout via REUTERS/File Photo

(Reuters) – Britain’s competition watchdog said on Tuesday that the acquisition of Altus Intervention by US-listed oilfield services company Baker Hughes could reduce competition between oil and gas operators in the United Kingdom.

The Competition and Markets Authority (CMA) said it was concerned that the loss of competition between merging companies could lead to higher prices, reduced selection and lower quality services for UK companies buying coiled tubing and pumping services.

Baker Hughes and Altus provide many well intervention services – the core services used by oil and gas operators to manage well production – in the UK.

The companies did not immediately respond to Reuters requests for comment.

Advertisement

The CMA said its Phase 1 investigation found that Baker Hughes would face competition from only one major supplier – Halliburton (NYSE: 🙂 – after the deal between the two largest providers of both coiled tubing and pumping services in the UK.

The regulator said Baker Hughes and Altus have five working days to submit proposals to address its concerns, or the watchdog will refer the deal to an in-depth Phase II investigation.

Source link

Advertisement
Continue Reading
Advertisement
Click to comment

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published.

Stock Market

Ben & Jerry’s does not have authority to sue over sale of Israeli ice cream By Reuters

Avatar

Published

on


© Reuters. FILE PHOTO: Ben & Jerry’s, a brand of Unilever, is displayed in a store in Manhattan, New York City, US, March 24, 2022. REUTERS/Andrew Kelly

Written by Jessica DiNapoli and Jonathan Stempel

NEW YORK (Reuters) – Unilever (NYSE: plc) has asked a U.S. judge to dismiss a Ben & Jerry’s lawsuit over the sale of the Israeli ice cream maker, saying the subsidiary’s “insistence on taking sides” in the conflict Palestinian Israeli gives its board of directors no authority to stop or even sue the sale.

In a statement Friday afternoon in Manhattan federal court, Unilever said the Ben & Jerry’s board “is no ordinary board.”

In the filings, she said the board has some responsibility to maintain its “social mission” and protect the brand under a shareholder agreement from 2000, when Unilever’s bought Ben & Jerry’s. But Unilever said the board could not sue.

Advertisement

Unilever also said that the board’s “recent insistence on taking sides in the Israeli-Palestinian conflict has created an intolerable situation” for both sides.

Ben & Jerry’s could not immediately be reached for comment.

The maker of Cherry Garcia and Chubby Hubby ice creams sued Unilever in July to prevent the sale of its businesses in Israel and the occupied West Bank to local licensee Avi Zenger.

Ben & Jerry’s products have been on sale in Israel for more than three decades, but the company said last year that West Bank sales were not in line with its values.

In August, a judge denied Ben & Jerry’s bid to stop those sales outright.

Advertisement

Last month, Ben & Jerry’s board of directors gave up selling Zinger ice cream, saying its products were “not to be confused with products” made by Ben & Jerry’s.

“Selling products bearing the Ben & Jerry’s insignia in the Occupied Palestinian Territories is contrary to our values,” the council said.

In its motion to dismiss the lawsuit, Unilever also said that Ben & Jerry’s had waited too long to claim that its trademark rights were “taken away” more than 20 years ago, and that the accusations behind the claim are a public matter.

(This story has been reworded to fix a typo in paragraph 1)

Source link

Advertisement

Continue Reading

Stock Market

Twitter users are running Musk Over Kanye West

Avatar

Published

on

Even Elon Musk has his limits.

Musk, Tesla (TSLA) – Get a free report The CEO, Twitter’s latest owner and self-described free-spirited free-lancer, has confirmed the microblogging site to be “an actual town square” ever since he walked through the front door with sink in hand.

“It’s mad!” The richest man in the world chirp On November 25 “I’m just fighting for free speech in America.”

Advertisement

In his quest, Musk recently Welcome back Donald Trump, ending a 22-month ban on the former Republican president.



Source link

Advertisement
Continue Reading

Stock Market

Renault and Nissan drop December 7 announcement of new deal – JNN via Reuters

Avatar

Published

on


© Reuters. FILE PHOTO: The logos of auto manufacturers Nissan and Renault are pictured at the Kyiv dealership in Ukraine on June 25, 2020. REUTERS/Valentin Ogiryenko/File Photo

TOKYO (Reuters) – Automakers Renault Japanese television network JNN reported Friday that Nissan (EPA:) and Nissan (OTC:) will drop a December 7 announcement of a new deal for their restructured alliance as they struggle to bridge their differences.

Both sides are engaged in discussions to restructure their alliance. Renault is looking to Nissan to invest in its electric vehicle business, while Nissan is seeking to sell part of Renault’s 43% stake in Nissan to put the two partners on an equal footing.

JNN said the two parties decided to forgo the Dec. 7 announcement because they had not reached an agreement as of Friday on how to share the intellectual property.

She added that there are no new plans for when to make an announcement. It is not clear from the report whether JNN cites a single source or multiple sources.

Advertisement

Neither Renault nor Nissan immediately responded to a request for comment.

Reuters reported earlier that both parties had set December 7 as a possible date for announcing the new alliance structure.

The question of how technology and intellectual property will be shared has proven to be a sticking point in the talks.

Source link

Advertisement
Continue Reading
Advertisement

Trending