Connect with us

Economic

Rich countries are offering Vietnam a deal worth more than $15 billion to switch from coal

Avatar

Published

on

Rich countries have offered Vietnam a $15.5 billion package to help pay for its transition from coal to renewable energy, the latest of a total of $44 billion in deals aimed at shifting developing economies away from fossil fuels.

Financing package, which reflects the agreements reached Indonesia and South Africa, which includes $7.75 billion in public financing over the next three to five years along with an estimated $7.75 billion in private financing.

The G7 countries, namely the United States, the United Kingdom, Germany, France, Italy, Canada and Japan, as well as Denmark, Norway and the European Union bloc, supported the package.

in contrast, Vietnam It agreed to cap the energy sector’s total emissions at 170 megatons of carbon dioxide per year by 2030, and to generate just under half of its electricity from renewables by then compared to the current target of 36 percent.

She also pledged to hold a summit coal 30.2 GW by 2030, down from the current target of 37 GW, in a move that would limit the country’s coal project pipeline.

By comparison, Indonesia, one of the world’s largest emitters, has pledged to reduce its energy sector emissions at 290 megatons of carbon dioxide per year by 2030, and to generate about a third of its energy from renewable sources by 2030.

Dutch Prime Minister Mark Rutte and Vietnamese Prime Minister Pham Minh Chinh in The Hague
Dutch Prime Minister Mark Rutte, left, and Vietnamese Prime Minister Pham Minh Chin in The Hague earlier this week after meetings that included discussions on climate and water management © Sem Van der Wal/EPA-EFE/Shutterstock

In the initiative launched at the UN COP26 summit last year, emerging countries were given incentives to stop using the dirtiest fossil fuels. An $8.5 billion deal with South Africa was recently concluded, and the proposed $20 billion package for Indonesia was launched at the G-20 meeting in Bali last month.

UN Secretary-General Antonio Guterres said the agreement between advanced economies and Vietnam, South Africa and Indonesia was a “crucial tool” to “unlock the emissions cuts our world needs in the 2020s”.

John Kerry, the US Secretary of State, said Vietnam’s commitments to “accelerate the transition from coal to renewables” indicate the country’s “seriousness in achieving a green transition for its people”.

“We look forward to partnering with Vietnam to put inclusive economic growth to work to intensify the fight against the climate crisis,” said Kerry, who helped set up the program in Vietnam, where he served during the war.

Private sector contributions are expected from lenders and investors who are part of the Glasgow Financial Alliance for Net Zero, an alliance of more than 500 financial institutions, including Citibank, Deutsche Bank, HSBC and Standard Chartered. Organizations will benefit from contributing to their net zero targets, as well as from providing financing.

Seed funding will come from the Asian Development Bank and the International Finance Corporation.

US officials said Washington will work with Vietnam and other parties over the coming months to implement the agreement, including identifying investments, financing opportunities and providing technical assistance.

A State Department official said the government will continue to work with Vietnamese officials to ensure that “meaningful investments” have been made in the country’s transportation network and that new renewable energy projects are linked.

But the so-called Equitable Energy Transition Partnership Initiative has not yet been implemented without some difficulties for the countries involved.

South African government Cyril Ramaphosa said last month that the structure of the $8.5 billion financing package relied heavily on loans that would increase the country’s debt burden.

Officials said only 4 percent of the total package was provided in the form of grants, with the remainder being a mix of sovereign and multilateral loans, and credit guarantees.

climate capital

Where climate change meets business, markets and politics. Find out about the Financial Times’ coverage here.

Curious about the Financial Times’ environmental sustainability commitments? Find out more about our science-based goals here


Source link

Continue Reading
Click to comment

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

Economic

We need to pay more attention to skewed economic signals

Avatar

Published

on

By

The writer is chair of Queen’s College, Cambridge and advisor to Allianz and Gramercy

Inflation was the dominant economic and financial issue of 2022 for most countries around the world, especially for advanced economies that have a consequential impact on the global economy and markets.

The effects have been seen in declining living standards, increasing inequality, increasing borrowing costs, stock and bond market losses, and occasional financial mishaps (fortunately small and so far contained).

In this new year, recession, both actual and feared, has joined inflation in the driving seat of the global economy and is likely to replace it. It’s a development that makes the global economy and investment portfolios subject to a wide range of possible outcomes — something that a growing number of bond investors seem to be aware of more than their equity counterparts.

International Monetary Fund iYou will likely review soon Her economic growth forecasts again, predicting that “a third of the world will be hit by recession this year”. What is particularly notable to me about these worsening global prospects is not only that the world’s three major economic regions – China, the European Union and the United States – are slowing down together, but also that this is happening for different reasons.

In China, a chaotic exit from the wrong Covid-19 policy is undermining demand and causing more supply disruptions. Such headwinds to domestic and global economic well-being will continue as long as China fails to improve the coverage and effectiveness of its vaccination efforts. The strength and sustainability of the subsequent recovery will also require that the country more vigorously renew a growth model that can no longer rely on greater globalization.

The European Union continues to deal with energy supply disruptions as the Russian invasion of Ukraine continues. Strengthening inventory management and reorientation of energy supplies is well advanced in many countries. However, it is not yet sufficient to lift immediate constraints on growth, let alone resolve long-term structural headwinds.

The United States has the least problematic view. The headwinds to growth are due to the Fed’s struggle to contain inflation after mischaracterizing rate increases as fleeting and then initially being too timid to adjust monetary policy.

The Fed’s shift to an aggressive front-load of interest rate hikes came too late to prevent the spread of inflation in the services sector and wages. As such, inflation is likely to remain stubborn at around 4 percent, be less sensitive to interest rate policies and expose the economy to greater risk for accidents from additional policy errors that undermine growth.

The uncertainties facing each of these three economic areas suggest that analysts should be more careful in reassuring us that recessionary pressures will be “short and shallow”. They need to be open, if only to avoid repeating the mistake of prematurely dismissing inflation as transient.

This is especially important because these diverse drivers of recessionary risk make financial fragility more threatening and policy shifts more difficult, including potentially Japan. Get out of interest rate control Policy. The range of possible outcomes is extraordinarily large.

On the one hand, a better policy response, including improving the supply response and protecting the most vulnerable populations, can counteract the global economic slowdown and, in the case of the United States, avert a recession.

On the other hand, additional policy errors and market turmoil can lead to self-reinforcing vicious cycles with rising inflation and rising interest rates, weakening credit and compressed earnings, and stressing market performance.

Judging by market prices, more bond investors are better understanding this, including by refusing to follow the Fed’s interest rate guidance this year. Instead of a sustainable path to higher rates for 2023, they believe recessionary pressures will lead to cuts later this year. If true, government bonds would provide the yield and potential for badly missed portfolio risk mitigation in 2022.

However, parts of the stock market is still weakly bearish pricing. Reconciling these different scenarios is more important than investors. Without better alignment within markets and with policy signals, the positive economic and financial outcomes we all desire will be no less likely. They will also be challenged by the risk of more unpleasant outcomes at a time of less economic and human resilience.

Source link

Continue Reading

Economic

Macro hedge funds end 2022 higher, investors say, while many others take big losses By Reuters

Avatar

Published

on

By

© Reuters. FILE PHOTO: Traders work on the trading floor of the New York Stock Exchange (NYSE) in New York City, US, January 5, 2023. REUTERS/Andrew Kelly

By Svea Herbst Baylis

NEW YORK (Reuters) – Some hedge funds betting on macroeconomic trends have boasted of double and even triple-digit gains for 2022, while other high-profile companies that have long been on technology stocks have suffered heavy losses in volatile markets, investors said.

Rokos Capital, run by Chris Rokos and one of a handful of so-called global macro companies, gained 51% last year. Fund investors this week, who asked not to be identified, said Brevan Howard Asset Management, the company where Rokos once worked, posted a gain of 20.14% and Caxton Associates returned 16.73%.

Haider Capital Management’s Haider Jupiter Fund rose 193%, an investor said.

Data from hedge fund research showed that many macro managers have avoided crumbling stock markets that have been rocked by rapid interest rate increases and geopolitical turmoil, including the war in Ukraine, to rank among the best performers in the hedge fund industry. The company’s macro index rose 14.2% while the general index of hedge funds fell 4.25%, its first loss since 2018.

Equity hedge funds, where the bulk of the industry’s roughly $3.7 trillion in assets are invested, fared worse with a loss of 10.4%, according to HFR data. And while that beat the broader stock market’s loss of 19.4%, some high-profile funds posted even bigger losses.

Tiger Global Management lost 56% while Whale Rock Capital Management ended the year with a 43% loss and Maverick Capital lost 23%. Coatue Management ended 2022 with a loss of 19%.

But not all companies that bet on technology stocks suffered. John Thaler JAT Capital finished the year with a 3.7% gain after fees after a 33% increase in 2021 and a 46% gain in 2020.

Sculptor Capital Management (NYSE::), where founder Dan Och is fighting the company’s current CEO in court over his salary increase, posted a 13% drop.

David Einhorn’s Greenlight Capital, which bet that Elon Musk would be forced to buy Twitter, ended the year up 37% while Rick Sandler’s Eminence Capital rose 7%.

A number of so-called multi-manager companies where teams of portfolio managers bet on a variety of sectors also boast positive returns and have been able to deliver on their promise that hedge funds can deliver better returns in distressed markets.

Balyasny’s Atlas Fund (NYSE: Enhanced) gained 9.7%, while Point72 Asset Management gained 10%. Millennium Management gained 12% while Carlson Capital ended the year with a 7% gain.

Representatives for the companies either did not respond to requests for comment or declined to comment.

Source link

Continue Reading

Economic

German automakers point to easing supply chain problems

Avatar

Published

on

By

Sales at BMW and Mercedes-Benz jumped in the final months of 2022 as the German premium auto brands indicated supply chain problems plaguing the industry were abating.

Automakers around the world have experienced parts shortages since the pandemic, especially semiconductors, leaving many of them with large fleets of incomplete vehicles that can’t be delivered to customers.

BMW and Mercedes each said their full-year vehicle deliveries fell last year by 4.8 percent and 1 percent, respectively, due to Suppliers Bottlenecks as well as lockdowns in China and the war in Ukraine.

But supply pressures eased in the last quarter of the year, as BMW recorded a 10.6 percent jump in sales, with 651,798 vehicles delivered, and Mercedes fulfilling 540,800 orders, up 17 percent from the same period in 2022.

BMW He said the main effects of supply chain bottlenecks and continued lockdowns were felt in the first six months of the year, adding that “sales were steadily picking up in the second half.”

Mercedes boss Ula Kallenius told the Financial Times last week that the list of problems in the auto supply chain was declining, but added that long waits for cars would continue into 2023.

“One chip is enough to be vital [ . . .] Missing, and then you can’t finish the car, even if you have everything else.

Both brands recorded strong sales growth electric car. Mercedes, which last week announced a plan to build 10,000 charging docks, said EV shipments grew 124 percent to 117,800 last year compared with its predecessor.

Similarly, BMW reported strong growth in electric vehicle sales, with deliveries of fully electric vehicles doubling last year to 215,755.

Analysts at Bank of America said that sales of electric vehicles, including hybrid cars, reached a historic peak last November, with 1.1 million units sold. They attributed this largely to the upcoming phase-out of customer subsidies in Germany.

Participate in Mercedes BMW and BMW prices held steady Tuesday morning as investors priced in an image of an improving showing.

Rolls-Royce, a subsidiary of BMW, announced Monday that sales have hit a 119-year record, driven by strong demand in the United States, its largest market.

The luxury brand has been largely unaffected by the semiconductor pressure, mainly because it makes relatively few compounds and therefore needs fewer chips.

Source link

Continue Reading

Trending