Connect with us

Stock Market

Elon Musk’s comment to reporters on Twitter sparked a backlash by Reuters

Avatar

Published

on


© Reuters. FILE PHOTO: A view of the Twitter logo at the company’s corporate headquarters in San Francisco, California, US, November 18, 2022. REUTERS/Carlos Barrea/File Photo

Written by Sheila Dange

(Reuters) – Twitter’s unprecedented suspension of at least five journalists over allegations that they disclosed the real-time location of site owner Elon Musk drew a swift response from government officials, advocacy groups and press organizations around the world on Friday.

Officials from France, Germany, the United Kingdom and the European Union have condemned the suspensions, and some have said the platform endangers press freedom.

The episode, dubbed the “Thursday Night Massacre” by one security researcher, is being viewed by critics as fresh evidence of the billionaire, who views himself as a “free speech tyrant,” wiping out speech and users he personally hates.

Roland Lescure, France’s industry minister, tweeted on Friday that after Musk suspended journalists, he would suspend his Twitter activity.

Melissa Fleming, the UN’s chief of communications, wrote on Twitter that she was “deeply disturbed” by the comment and “media freedom is not a game”.

Germany’s Foreign Ministry has warned Twitter that the ministry has a problem with actions that threaten press freedom.

The comment stemmed from a dispute over a Twitter account called ElonJet, which had been tracking Musk’s private jet using publicly available information.

On Wednesday, Twitter suspended the account and others who had tracked the private jets, despite Musk’s previous tweet that said he would not suspend ElonJet in the name of freedom of speech.

Soon after, Twitter changed its privacy policy to prohibit the sharing of “live location information.”

Then on Thursday evening, several journalists including those from the New York Times, CNN and The Washington Post were suspended from Twitter without notice.

In an email to Reuters overnight, Twitter’s head of trust and safety said the team manually reviewed “any and all accounts” that violated the new privacy policy by posting direct links to an ElonJet account.

“I understand that the focus seems to be mainly on journalists’ accounts, but we’ve applied the policy equally to journalists and non-journalists today,” Irwin said in the email.

The Association for the Advancement of Business Writing and Editing said in a statement Friday that Twitter’s actions “violate the spirit of the First Amendment and the principle that social media platforms will allow the unfiltered distribution of information already in the public arena.”

Musk appeared briefly in a Twitter Spaces audio chat hosted by the journalists, which quickly degenerated into a contentious debate over whether the arrested journalists had actually exposed Musk’s real-time location in violation of policy.

“If you do that, you get suspended. End of story,” Musk said repeatedly in response to questions. Dox is a term for posting private information about someone, usually with malicious intent.

The Washington Post’s Drew Harwell, one of the journalists suspended but who was nonetheless able to join the voice chat, dismissed the notion that he had exposed Musk or his family’s exact location by posting a link to ElonJet.

Soon after, BuzzFeed reporter Katie Notopoulos, who hosted the Spaces chat, tweeted that the audio session was suddenly cut short and the recording was not available.

In a tweet explaining what happened, Musk said, “We’re fixing an old bug. Should work tomorrow.”

Source link

Continue Reading
Click to comment

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

Stock Market

Red Flags That Your Spouse Is Hiding Money (And What To Do About It)

Avatar

Published

on

By

Marriage can be hard enough without one spouse hiding money from the other.

When financial infidelity occurs in the form of “hidden cash,” a marriage or a live-forever relationship can easily be ended.

The truth is About 30% of American couples suffer from financial infidelity. Other evidence shows that more than 75% of couples describe the hidden money situation as negative and common 10% of these scenarios end in divorce.



Source link

Continue Reading

Stock Market

US judge orders Norwegian Cruise Line to pay $110m for use of Cuba port By Reuters

Avatar

Published

on

By


© Reuters. Norwegian American Airlines cruise ship Marina arrives in Havana Bay, Cuba on March 9, 2017. REUTERS/Alexander Meneghini/File/File Photo

Written by Brian Ellsworth

MIAMI (Reuters) – Norwegian Shipping Line (NYSE) has to pay $110 million in compensation for the use of a port confiscated by the Cuban government in 1960, a US judge said Friday, marking a significant milestone for Cuban Americans. Who are seeking reparations for the Cold War era. Assets confiscation.

The decision by US District Judge Beth Bloom in Miami follows her decision in March that use of the Havana Cruise Terminal constituted smuggling of forfeited property belonging to the plaintiff, Delaware-registered Havana Docks Corp.

The decision read: “The judgment is made in favor of Plaintiff Havana Docks Corporation and against Norwegian Cruise Line Holdings, Ltd.”

“The plaintiff was awarded $109,848,747.87 in damages,” it says, adding that the Norwegian must also pay an additional $3 million in legal fees and costs.

Norwegian Cruise Line did not immediately respond to a request for comment.

Cuban President Miguel Diaz-Canel has sharply criticized the Helms-Burton Act, calling it an extraterritorial violation of international law.

Havana Docks also sued Carnival Cruise Lines (NYSE: ), Royal Caribbean (NYSE:) and MSC under the Helms-Burton Act, which allows US citizens to sue over the use of property seized in Cuba after 1959.

The ruling could fuel more lawsuits by Cuban exiles pursuing claims, worth $2 billion, according to one estimate, over asset seizures under late Cuban leader Fidel Castro.

It may also serve as a reminder to multinational companies of the complexities that can come with doing business in Cuba.

In 2016, US cruise ships began traveling to Cuba for the first time in decades after a détente negotiated by former President Barack Obama eased some provisions of a Cold War US embargo.

But the Trump administration in 2019 ordered a halt to all such cruises amid efforts to pressure Cuba over its support for Venezuelan President Nicolas Maduro, Washington’s ideological foe.

The Trump administration has also allowed US citizens to sue third parties for using property seized by Cuban authorities, a provision of the Helms-Burton Act that every previous president has waived since the law was passed in 1996.

Havana Docs says Cuba, which has been under a US trade embargo for decades, has never compensated it for taking the drug.

The four cruise lines sued in 2019 in the US District Court for the Southern District of Florida. Bloom in March held the companies liable for damages under the Helms-Burton Act, also known as the Libertad Act.

According to the US-Cuban Economic and Trade Council, a nonprofit organization that provides information on relations between the two countries, 5,913 validated claims related to property seized in Cuba represent an estimated liability of nearly $2 billion.

Forty-four lawsuits have been filed under Title III of the Helms-Burton Act, the organization says.

“For the current plaintiffs of Cuban descent, (the decision) will give them a moment of relief,” said John Cavulich, the group’s president. “It will give them a moment to say ‘You can run but you can’t hide,'” Cavulich said.

Source link

Continue Reading

Stock Market

Is a Royal Caribbean or Carnival beverage package worth it?

Avatar

Published

on

By

An all-inclusive beverage package that gives you access to beer, wine, liquor, bottled water, soda, specialty coffee, and even shakes/juices may cost more than your cruise fare.

This is especially true right now when many cruise cabins are being sold at discounted prices while the drinks package prices have gone up.

Deciding whether to purchase a drink package is a challenge because you have to estimate whether you will be drinking enough to cover the cost. Or, more importantly, whether you’d spend more if you decided not to purchase a drink package.



Source link

Continue Reading

Trending